Skip to content

Bronze Age England: Where Do the Closest Genomes Lie?

Three methods on the same 20 Beaker-period and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons from England: Gaussian-process match maps, entropy-rescaled PCA distances and qpAdm.

Mvagnus Albertus · Popualtion Geneticist

Published 13 min read

Where do the closest genomes to Bronze Age England lie? Three methods are applied to the same 20 Beaker-period persons (2380–1990 BCE) and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons (1480–1130 BCE) from England. A Gaussian-process match map following the principle of Mobest1 places the closest contemporaneous genomes of the Beaker-period persons on the continent (Germany 13 %, Sweden 10 %, France 10 % of the land probability) and the best match of none of the 20 persons inside Britain and Ireland; the map of the Middle Bronze Age persons is flatter (Germany 12 %, Britain and Ireland 11 %, France 10 %). In entropy-rescaled PCA distances2 the Beaker-period persons lie closer to the Netherlands Beaker group than to the English Neolithic in every panel (Q = 0.07, 95 % interval 0.02–0.14; Czechia Beaker 0.19, 0.14–0.23). In qpAdm, 93.8 ± 1.3 % Netherlands Beaker and 6.2 % English Neolithic fit the Beaker-period persons on right panel D (p = 0.69) and are rejected on right panel P (p = 0.0018), where the weights are the same; the English Neolithic alone is rejected on both. For the Middle Bronze Age persons the English Beaker group alone is rejected (p < 10⁻⁹), and two models with an added source, English Neolithic (9–10 %) or French Early Bronze Age (23–26 %), are retained on both panels. Positions on a map are not ancestry.

Question

A Beaker-associated turnover in Britain was reported by Olalde et al.3 This article asks where the closest genomes to two groups of persons from England lie, with three methods that read different things: where on a map the contemporaneous genomes most similar to a person lie (a match map1), which of two groups a person is closer to on an entropy-rescaled PCA map2, and which mixtures of sampled source groups fit the persons in qpAdm. The 20 Beaker-period and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons are the persons of the Gaussian-process maps of England, so one set of persons is read three times. A map position and a PCA distance are not ancestry; only the qpAdm models give weights, and these hold for the stated sources and right panels.

Persons, methods and settings

Persons. The persons are those of the Gaussian-process match maps of England: 20 Beaker-period persons (2380–1990 BCE; group GP_England_BellBeaker, called England Beaker below) and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons (1480–1130 BCE; GP_England_MBA). The same persons enter all three methods.

Match maps. Own Gaussian-process implementation following the principle of Mobest1 (not the Mobest software): a regression over space and time (kernel exp[−(Δs²/800² + Δt²/800²)], 800 km and 800 years) of four Nexju N25 PCA coordinates over 12,990 ancient individuals of the AADR v66. Each person is placed at their own date, the persons shown are left out of the reference, and the map of a group is the mean of the maps of its persons. Shares by country refer to land only; the share of persons whose cell of highest probability lies inside Britain and Ireland and the share of the probability on sea cells are reported with them. Peaks follow where DNA has been sampled, not necessarily where people lived.

Rescaled PCA distances. Entropy-rescaled PCA distances after Taleb et al.2 (maps A and B) in the Nexju PCA-distance series, over three reference panels (WE8 with shrinkmode projection, WE8 with plain projection, EU5 with shrinkmode projection), that is six settings, and 16 shifts of the origin. Q is the distance of a target to the first group of a contrast over its distance to the second; below 1 the target is on the side of the first group. Intervals are 95 % bootstrap intervals (2,000 resamples of samples within groups) on the base panel, WE8 with shrinkmode.

qpAdm. qpAdm on the Nexju platform with alpha 0.05 and allSnps = false, on two right-group panels fixed before the runs: panel D (primary; 14 right groups; 0.70–0.72 M SNPs) and panel P (regional; 11 right groups; 1.00–1.04 M SNPs). A model is retained when p ≥ 0.05, all weights lie between 0 and 100 % and the weight SE is below 10 percentage points; otherwise it is rejected. The models were declared before the runs: for the Beaker-period persons Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic (BB1), Czechia Beaker + England Neolithic (BB2) and each of Netherlands Beaker (BB3) and England Neolithic (BB4) alone; for the Middle Bronze Age persons England Beaker alone (MB1), England Beaker + England Neolithic (MB2) and England Beaker + France Early Bronze Age (MB3). The right-panel sensitivity of BB1 was run from each panel as base, dropping one right group at a time and swapping the panel.

Results

Match maps. For the 20 Beaker-period persons the five largest shares of the land probability are Germany 13 %, Sweden 10 %, France 10 %, Russia 9 % and Ukraine 9 % (Table 1). Britain and Ireland are not among them, none of the 20 persons has its cell of highest probability inside Britain and Ireland (0 %), and 35 % of the probability of the map falls on sea cells. The 25 Middle Bronze Age persons give a flatter picture: Germany 12 %, Britain and Ireland 11 %, France 10 %, Sweden 8 % and Norway 7 %; 3 of 25 persons (12 %) have their best match inside Britain and Ireland, and 44 % of the probability falls on sea cells. The Beaker-period result is consistent with the Beaker-associated turnover reported by Olalde et al.3

Table 1Match maps of the Beaker-period and Middle Bronze Age persons

Group

Persons

Five largest shares of the land probability

Best match inside Britain and Ireland

Probability on sea cells

England Beaker

20 (2380–1990 BCE)

Germany 13 %, Sweden 10 %, France 10 %, Russia 9 %, Ukraine 9 %

0 of 20 (0 %)

35 %

England Middle Bronze Age

25 (1480–1130 BCE)

Germany 12 %, Britain and Ireland 11 %, France 10 %, Sweden 8 %, Norway 7 %

3 of 25 (12 %)

44 %

Shares refer to land only and are rounded. Best match: the share of persons whose cell of highest probability lies inside Britain and Ireland. Nugget 0.4; 5,124–8,226 training individuals per person; 45 persons left out of the reference.

England Beaker, GP persons (n=20)England Beaker, GP persons (n=20)P1 Netherlands Beaker (n=23)P1 Netherlands Beaker (n=23)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)StableMap A (rescaled): Q = 0.069 (0.020–0.143)Map B (bits): Q = 0.068 (0.019–0.142)England Beaker, GP persons (n=20)England Beaker, GP persons (n=20)P1 Czechia Beaker (n=61)P1 Czechia Beaker (n=61)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)StableMap A (rescaled): Q = 0.189 (0.145–0.233)Map B (bits): Q = 0.183 (0.139–0.227)England Middle Bronze Age, GP persons (n=25)England Middle Bronze Age, GP persons (n=25)P1 Netherlands Beaker (n=23)P1 Netherlands Beaker (n=23)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)StableMap A (rescaled): Q = 0.217 (0.161–0.291)Map B (bits): Q = 0.217 (0.162–0.292)England Middle Bronze Age, GP persons (n=25)England Middle Bronze Age, GP persons (n=25)P1 Czechia Beaker (n=61)P1 Czechia Beaker (n=61)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)P2 England Neolithic (n=46)StableMap A (rescaled): Q = 0.132 (0.084–0.192)Map B (bits): Q = 0.121 (0.077–0.177)0.050.10.250.51Q = d(target, P1) / d(target, P2), log scale; below 1 the target is nearer P1
  • Map A (rescaled)
  • Map B (bits)

19 groups · 6 settings · 16 shifts · 2,000 resamples

Figure 1Q for two Beaker contrasts on maps A and B, with bootstrap intervals. Q with 95 % bootstrap intervals (2,000 resamples of samples within groups, log axis) on the rescaled maps A and B, base panel WE8, for the Beaker-period and the Middle Bronze Age persons: Netherlands Beaker against England Neolithic, and Czechia Beaker against England Neolithic. An interval entirely below 1 puts the persons on the side of the Beaker group. Positions on a map are not ancestry.

Rescaled PCA distances. The Beaker-period persons lie closer to the Netherlands Beaker group than to the English Neolithic: Q = 0.07 (95 % interval 0.02–0.14) on map A and 0.07 (0.02–0.14) on map B, and this side holds in all six settings and all 16 origin shifts (Fig. 1, Table 2). Against Czechia Beaker, Q is 0.19 (0.14–0.23) on map A and 0.18 (0.14–0.23) on map B; against Germany Beaker it is 0.23 and 0.22. All four contrasts of the series put the Beaker-period persons on the side of the Beaker group, with intervals that exclude 1. The Middle Bronze Age persons also lie on the side of the Beaker groups in all four contrasts (Q from 0.12 to 0.23).

Table 2Q of the Beaker-period and Middle Bronze Age persons on the rescaled maps A and B, base panel WE8

Target

Contrast

Q on map A

Q on map B

Beaker-period persons

Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic

0.07 (0.02–0.14)

0.07 (0.02–0.14)

Beaker-period persons

Czechia Beaker vs England Neolithic

0.19 (0.14–0.23)

0.18 (0.14–0.23)

Beaker-period persons

Germany Beaker vs England Neolithic

0.23 (0.18–0.28)

0.22 (0.17–0.27)

Beaker-period persons

Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic, Megalithic

0.07 (0.02–0.15)

0.07 (0.02–0.15)

Middle Bronze Age persons

Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic

0.22 (0.16–0.29)

0.22 (0.16–0.29)

Middle Bronze Age persons

Czechia Beaker vs England Neolithic

0.13 (0.08–0.19)

0.12 (0.08–0.18)

Middle Bronze Age persons

Germany Beaker vs England Neolithic

0.18 (0.12–0.25)

0.16 (0.11–0.23)

Middle Bronze Age persons

Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic, Megalithic

0.23 (0.17–0.31)

0.23 (0.17–0.31)

Q = d(target, first group) / d(target, second group); below 1 the persons are on the side of the first group. 95 % bootstrap intervals in brackets. Every interval excludes 1, and in all six settings and all 16 origin shifts every contrast puts the persons on the side of the first group. Groups: Netherlands Beaker (23), Czechia Beaker (61), Germany Beaker, 3 sites (42), England Neolithic (46), England Neolithic, Megalithic (60); numbers are the samples of the group.

qpAdm. For the Beaker-period persons, 93.8 ± 1.3 % Netherlands Beaker and 6.2 % England Neolithic fit on right panel D (p = 0.687, χ² 9.2 with 12 df; Table 3). On panel P the weights are nearly the same (93.1 % and 6.9 %, SE 1.3 pp) and the model is rejected (p = 0.0018). England Neolithic alone is rejected on both panels (p ≈ 0), as are Netherlands Beaker alone (p = 0.0046 on panel D) and Czechia Beaker with England Neolithic (p = 0.021 on panel D, 0.0003 on panel P). On panel D all 13 variants that drop one right group fit (p from 0.48 to 0.87; Netherlands Beaker 93.6–94.3 %; Fig. 2). On panel P, 9 of the 10 such variants are rejected and only the variant without Sweden_Rossberga_N fits (p = 0.105; Fig. 3); the model counts as rejected on panel P.

For the Middle Bronze Age persons, England Beaker alone is rejected on both panels (p = 2.3×10⁻¹⁰ and ≈ 3×10⁻¹⁵; Table 4). England Beaker with England Neolithic (90–91 % and 9–10 %) and England Beaker with France Early Bronze Age (74–77 % and 23–26 %) are retained on both panels (p from 0.079 to 0.334). The runs do not separate the two.

Table 3qpAdm models of the Beaker-period persons (n=20), panels D and P

Model

Sources

Panel

Weights (SE)

p

χ² (df)

Verdict

BB1

Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic

D

93.8 % + 6.2 % (1.3 pp)

0.687

9.2 (12)

retained

BB1

Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic

P

93.1 % + 6.9 % (1.3 pp)

0.0018

26.4 (9)

rejected

BB2

Czechia Beaker + England Neolithic

D

infeasible

0.021

–

rejected

BB2

Czechia Beaker + England Neolithic

P

infeasible

0.0003

–

rejected

BB3

Netherlands Beaker alone

D

100 %

0.0046

–

rejected

BB3

Netherlands Beaker alone

P

100 %

4.5×10⁻⁸

–

rejected

BB4

England Neolithic alone

D

100 %

≈ 0

4305.2 (13)

rejected

BB4

England Neolithic alone

P

100 %

≈ 0

4582.9 (10)

rejected

Retained: p ≥ 0.05, all weights between 0 and 100 %, weight SE below 10 percentage points (pp). SE: block-jackknife standard error of the weight; the two weights of a model sum to 100 % and share one SE. –: not listed. Netherlands Beaker is Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker, England Neolithic is England_N (46 samples).

Table 4qpAdm models of the Middle Bronze Age persons (n=25), panels D and P

Model

Sources

Panel

Weights (SE)

p

χ² (df)

Verdict

MB1

England Beaker alone

D

100 %

2.3×10⁻¹⁰

72.9 (13)

rejected

MB1

England Beaker alone

P

100 %

≈ 3×10⁻¹⁵

91.3 (10)

rejected

MB2

England Beaker + England Neolithic

D

91.3 % + 8.7 % (1.2 pp)

0.104

18.4 (12)

retained

MB2

England Beaker + England Neolithic

P

90.2 % + 9.8 % (1.1 pp)

0.079

15.5 (9)

retained

MB3

England Beaker + France Early Bronze Age

D

77.3 % + 22.7 % (2.8 pp)

0.202

15.8 (12)

retained

MB3

England Beaker + France Early Bronze Age

P

74.3 % + 25.7 % (2.6 pp)

0.334

10.2 (9)

retained

All three models declared for this target are shown. England Beaker is the group of the 20 Beaker-period persons of the maps. Retained, SE and pp as in Table 3.

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.6% ±1.3%England_N6.4% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.872 · 718,311 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.8% ±1.3%England_N6.2% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.722 · 717,334 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.9% ±1.3%England_N6.1% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.714 · 717,381 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.8% ±1.3%England_N6.2% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.687 · 717,332 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.8% ±1.3%England_N6.2% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.676 · 717,347 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.7% ±1.4%England_N6.3% ±1.4%

    Fitsp = 0.649 · 727,707 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker94.3% ±1.5%England_N5.7% ±1.5%

    Fitsp = 0.647 · 717,332 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.8% ±1.3%England_N6.2% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.639 · 717,973 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.6% ±1.4%England_N6.4% ±1.4%

    Fitsp = 0.631 · 717,332 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.7% ±1.4%England_N6.3% ±1.4%

    Fitsp = 0.630 · 717,397 SNPs

10 of 17 models

Figure 2Right-panel sensitivity of BB1 from panel D. Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic for the Beaker-period persons, base panel D. The base model fits (p = 0.687). All 13 variants that drop one right group fit (p from 0.48 to 0.87; Netherlands Beaker 93.6–94.3 %). The alternative panel P rejects the model (p = 0.0018); each source alone is rejected.
  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.8% ±1.3%England_N6.2% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.687 · 717,332 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93% ±1.3%England_N7% ±1.3%

    Fitsp = 0.105 · 1,039,792 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker94% ±1.4%England_N6% ±1.4%

    Rejectedp = 0.009 · 1,039,060 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker92.8% ±1.3%England_N7.2% ±1.3%

    Rejectedp = 0.003 · 1,047,263 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.3% ±1.3%England_N6.7% ±1.3%

    Rejectedp = 0.002 · 1,051,778 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker92.9% ±1.3%England_N7.1% ±1.3%

    Rejectedp = 0.002 · 1,044,715 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.1% ±1.3%England_N6.9% ±1.3%

    Rejectedp = 0.002 · 1,039,016 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.1% ±1.3%England_N6.9% ±1.3%

    Rejectedp = 0.002 · 1,039,013 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 93%, England_N 7%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93% ±1.3%England_N7% ±1.3%

    Rejectedp = 0.001 · 1,039,013 SNPs

  • Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker 94%, England_N 6%

    Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker93.6% ±1.6%England_N6.4% ±1.6%

    Rejectedp = 0.001 · 1,039,013 SNPs

10 of 14 models

Figure 3Right-panel sensitivity of BB1 from panel P. The same model, base panel P: rejected (p = 0.0018; 93.1 % and 6.9 %). Of the 10 variants that drop one right group, 9 are rejected (p from 0.0007 to 0.009) and one fits: without Sweden_Rossberga_N, p = 0.105. The alternative panel D fits (p = 0.687). The variant that fits is a sensitivity result and does not change the verdict on panel P.

Reading the three methods

Beaker period. The three methods point the same way. The map places the closest contemporaneous genomes on the continent; in rescaled PCA distances the persons lie closer to the Netherlands Beaker group than to the English Neolithic in all six settings; in qpAdm Netherlands Beaker with 6 % English Neolithic fits on panel D, and England Neolithic alone is rejected on both panels. qpAdm fits on one of the two right-panel sets only.

Middle Bronze Age. The English Beaker group alone does not fit. In both retained models it carries 74–91 % of the persons, and the rest is English Neolithic (9–10 %) or French Early Bronze Age (23–26 %); these runs do not tell the two apart. The map of the Middle Bronze Age persons is flatter than that of the Beaker-period persons, with Britain and Ireland second (11 %).

What the methods show and what they do not. A map position and a PCA distance describe where similar genomes lie, not ancestry, and peaks follow where DNA has been sampled. Only qpAdm gives weights, and these hold for the stated sources and right panels. A source in a model is a sampled group; its name does not say where the ancestors lived.

Data and methods. Match maps: own Gaussian-process implementation following the principle of Mobest (Schmid & Schiffels 2023); not the Mobest software, not PANE, not qpAdm; exploratory, post hoc. Training data: 12,990 ancient individuals of the AADR v66 (29.9–70 °N, −24–70 °E, 150–8500 BP, at least 15,000 SNPs, one version per person, training window ±2000 years); response: four Nexju N25 PCA coordinates (European PC1–2, Middle-Eastern PC1–2); kernel 800 km and 800 years; nugget 0.4 and the variance of each coordinate fitted by marginal likelihood on a random subset of 5,008 of the 9,271 reference individuals dated 1,080–6,328 BP; 5,124–8,226 training individuals per person; map: product of normal densities, normalised to 1, 40 km grid without land mask, smoothed to 10 km by cubic interpolation; the 45 persons shown are left out of the reference. Validation: on Albania, a Balkan peak appeared for 2 of 4 test persons. The maps were computed with the author's own code; they are not a Nexju analysis run. Rescaled PCA distances: Nexju PCA-distance run on maps A and B with the base panel WE8-shrinkmode (992,097 SNPs) and the settings WE8-plain and EU5-shrinkmode (970,217 SNPs); 16 origin shifts; bootstrap of 2,000 resamples, 95 %; a statement is stable when it holds in at least 5 of 6 settings, at least 13 of 16 shifts and in the bootstrap. qpAdm: Nexju qpAdm, alpha 0.05, allSnps = false. Panel D (14 right groups): Australian, Papuan, Mbuti, Karitiana, Turkey_PPN, Israel_Natufian, Iran_WezmehCave_N, Italy_Sicily_Epigravettian, Turkey_N, Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya, Iran_GanjDareh_N, Georgia_KotiasKlde_Mesolithic, Serbia_IronGates_Mesolithic, Russia_Karelia_Mesolithic. Panel P (11 right groups): Australian, Papuan, Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya, Iran_GanjDareh_N, Georgia_KotiasKlde_Mesolithic, Sweden_Mesolithic_HG, Germany_GrossFredenwalde_Mesolithic, France_Yonne_N, Austria_N_LBK, Germany_BlatterhohleCave_MN, Sweden_Rossberga_N. Sources: Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker, Czechia_BellBeaker, England_N, France_EBA and the 20 Beaker-period persons (GP_England_BellBeaker). Targets: GP_England_BellBeaker (20) and GP_England_MBA (25). Models and right-group panels were fixed before the runs.

1.

Schmid, C. & Schiffels, S. Estimating human mobility in Holocene Western Eurasia with large-scale ancient genomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120(9), e2218375120 (2023).

2.

Taleb, N. N., Zalloua, P., Elbassioni, K., Hatzikirou, H., Henschel, A. & Platt, D. E. Informational rescaling of PCA maps with application to genetic distance. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 27, 48–56 (2025).

3.

Olalde, I. et al. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555, 190–196 (2018).

Magnus Albertus Papers · @AlbertusMvagnus

Every article

Allow analytics cookies? They help us see how the site is used so we can improve it. Your DNA and results are never included. Details