Bronze Age England: Where Do the Closest Genomes Lie?
Three methods on the same 20 Beaker-period and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons from England: Gaussian-process match maps, entropy-rescaled PCA distances and qpAdm.
Where do the closest genomes to Bronze Age England lie? Three methods are applied to the same 20 Beaker-period persons (2380–1990 BCE) and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons (1480–1130 BCE) from England. A Gaussian-process match map following the principle of Mobest1 places the closest contemporaneous genomes of the Beaker-period persons on the continent (Germany 13 %, Sweden 10 %, France 10 % of the land probability) and the best match of none of the 20 persons inside Britain and Ireland; the map of the Middle Bronze Age persons is flatter (Germany 12 %, Britain and Ireland 11 %, France 10 %). In entropy-rescaled PCA distances2 the Beaker-period persons lie closer to the Netherlands Beaker group than to the English Neolithic in every panel (Q = 0.07, 95 % interval 0.02–0.14; Czechia Beaker 0.19, 0.14–0.23). In qpAdm, 93.8 ± 1.3 % Netherlands Beaker and 6.2 % English Neolithic fit the Beaker-period persons on right panel D (p = 0.69) and are rejected on right panel P (p = 0.0018), where the weights are the same; the English Neolithic alone is rejected on both. For the Middle Bronze Age persons the English Beaker group alone is rejected (p < 10⁻⁹), and two models with an added source, English Neolithic (9–10 %) or French Early Bronze Age (23–26 %), are retained on both panels. Positions on a map are not ancestry.
Question
A Beaker-associated turnover in Britain was reported by Olalde et al.3 This article asks where the closest genomes to two groups of persons from England lie, with three methods that read different things: where on a map the contemporaneous genomes most similar to a person lie (a match map1), which of two groups a person is closer to on an entropy-rescaled PCA map2, and which mixtures of sampled source groups fit the persons in qpAdm. The 20 Beaker-period and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons are the persons of the Gaussian-process maps of England, so one set of persons is read three times. A map position and a PCA distance are not ancestry; only the qpAdm models give weights, and these hold for the stated sources and right panels.
Persons, methods and settings
Persons. The persons are those of the Gaussian-process match maps of England: 20 Beaker-period persons (2380–1990 BCE; group GP_England_BellBeaker, called England Beaker below) and 25 Middle Bronze Age persons (1480–1130 BCE; GP_England_MBA). The same persons enter all three methods.
Match maps. Own Gaussian-process implementation following the principle of Mobest1 (not the Mobest software): a regression over space and time (kernel exp[−(Δs²/800² + Δt²/800²)], 800 km and 800 years) of four Nexju N25 PCA coordinates over 12,990 ancient individuals of the AADR v66. Each person is placed at their own date, the persons shown are left out of the reference, and the map of a group is the mean of the maps of its persons. Shares by country refer to land only; the share of persons whose cell of highest probability lies inside Britain and Ireland and the share of the probability on sea cells are reported with them. Peaks follow where DNA has been sampled, not necessarily where people lived.
Rescaled PCA distances. Entropy-rescaled PCA distances after Taleb et al.2 (maps A and B) in the Nexju PCA-distance series, over three reference panels (WE8 with shrinkmode projection, WE8 with plain projection, EU5 with shrinkmode projection), that is six settings, and 16 shifts of the origin. Q is the distance of a target to the first group of a contrast over its distance to the second; below 1 the target is on the side of the first group. Intervals are 95 % bootstrap intervals (2,000 resamples of samples within groups) on the base panel, WE8 with shrinkmode.
qpAdm. qpAdm on the Nexju platform with alpha 0.05 and allSnps = false, on two right-group panels fixed before the runs: panel D (primary; 14 right groups; 0.70–0.72 M SNPs) and panel P (regional; 11 right groups; 1.00–1.04 M SNPs). A model is retained when p ≥ 0.05, all weights lie between 0 and 100 % and the weight SE is below 10 percentage points; otherwise it is rejected. The models were declared before the runs: for the Beaker-period persons Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic (BB1), Czechia Beaker + England Neolithic (BB2) and each of Netherlands Beaker (BB3) and England Neolithic (BB4) alone; for the Middle Bronze Age persons England Beaker alone (MB1), England Beaker + England Neolithic (MB2) and England Beaker + France Early Bronze Age (MB3). The right-panel sensitivity of BB1 was run from each panel as base, dropping one right group at a time and swapping the panel.
Results
Match maps. For the 20 Beaker-period persons the five largest shares of the land probability are Germany 13 %, Sweden 10 %, France 10 %, Russia 9 % and Ukraine 9 % (Table 1). Britain and Ireland are not among them, none of the 20 persons has its cell of highest probability inside Britain and Ireland (0 %), and 35 % of the probability of the map falls on sea cells. The 25 Middle Bronze Age persons give a flatter picture: Germany 12 %, Britain and Ireland 11 %, France 10 %, Sweden 8 % and Norway 7 %; 3 of 25 persons (12 %) have their best match inside Britain and Ireland, and 44 % of the probability falls on sea cells. The Beaker-period result is consistent with the Beaker-associated turnover reported by Olalde et al.3
Table 1 | Match maps of the Beaker-period and Middle Bronze Age persons
Group
Persons
Five largest shares of the land probability
Best match inside Britain and Ireland
Probability on sea cells
England Beaker
20 (2380–1990 BCE)
Germany 13 %, Sweden 10 %, France 10 %, Russia 9 %, Ukraine 9 %
0 of 20 (0 %)
35 %
England Middle Bronze Age
25 (1480–1130 BCE)
Germany 12 %, Britain and Ireland 11 %, France 10 %, Sweden 8 %, Norway 7 %
3 of 25 (12 %)
44 %
Shares refer to land only and are rounded. Best match: the share of persons whose cell of highest probability lies inside Britain and Ireland. Nugget 0.4; 5,124–8,226 training individuals per person; 45 persons left out of the reference.
Figure 1 | Q for two Beaker contrasts on maps A and B, with bootstrap intervals. Q with 95 % bootstrap intervals (2,000 resamples of samples within groups, log axis) on the rescaled maps A and B, base panel WE8, for the Beaker-period and the Middle Bronze Age persons: Netherlands Beaker against England Neolithic, and Czechia Beaker against England Neolithic. An interval entirely below 1 puts the persons on the side of the Beaker group. Positions on a map are not ancestry.
Rescaled PCA distances. The Beaker-period persons lie closer to the Netherlands Beaker group than to the English Neolithic: Q = 0.07 (95 % interval 0.02–0.14) on map A and 0.07 (0.02–0.14) on map B, and this side holds in all six settings and all 16 origin shifts (Fig. 1, Table 2). Against Czechia Beaker, Q is 0.19 (0.14–0.23) on map A and 0.18 (0.14–0.23) on map B; against Germany Beaker it is 0.23 and 0.22. All four contrasts of the series put the Beaker-period persons on the side of the Beaker group, with intervals that exclude 1. The Middle Bronze Age persons also lie on the side of the Beaker groups in all four contrasts (Q from 0.12 to 0.23).
Table 2 | Q of the Beaker-period and Middle Bronze Age persons on the rescaled maps A and B, base panel WE8
Target
Contrast
Q on map A
Q on map B
Beaker-period persons
Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic
0.07 (0.02–0.14)
0.07 (0.02–0.14)
Beaker-period persons
Czechia Beaker vs England Neolithic
0.19 (0.14–0.23)
0.18 (0.14–0.23)
Beaker-period persons
Germany Beaker vs England Neolithic
0.23 (0.18–0.28)
0.22 (0.17–0.27)
Beaker-period persons
Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic, Megalithic
0.07 (0.02–0.15)
0.07 (0.02–0.15)
Middle Bronze Age persons
Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic
0.22 (0.16–0.29)
0.22 (0.16–0.29)
Middle Bronze Age persons
Czechia Beaker vs England Neolithic
0.13 (0.08–0.19)
0.12 (0.08–0.18)
Middle Bronze Age persons
Germany Beaker vs England Neolithic
0.18 (0.12–0.25)
0.16 (0.11–0.23)
Middle Bronze Age persons
Netherlands Beaker vs England Neolithic, Megalithic
0.23 (0.17–0.31)
0.23 (0.17–0.31)
Q = d(target, first group) / d(target, second group); below 1 the persons are on the side of the first group. 95 % bootstrap intervals in brackets. Every interval excludes 1, and in all six settings and all 16 origin shifts every contrast puts the persons on the side of the first group. Groups: Netherlands Beaker (23), Czechia Beaker (61), Germany Beaker, 3 sites (42), England Neolithic (46), England Neolithic, Megalithic (60); numbers are the samples of the group.
qpAdm. For the Beaker-period persons, 93.8 ± 1.3 % Netherlands Beaker and 6.2 % England Neolithic fit on right panel D (p = 0.687, χ² 9.2 with 12 df; Table 3). On panel P the weights are nearly the same (93.1 % and 6.9 %, SE 1.3 pp) and the model is rejected (p = 0.0018). England Neolithic alone is rejected on both panels (p ≈ 0), as are Netherlands Beaker alone (p = 0.0046 on panel D) and Czechia Beaker with England Neolithic (p = 0.021 on panel D, 0.0003 on panel P). On panel D all 13 variants that drop one right group fit (p from 0.48 to 0.87; Netherlands Beaker 93.6–94.3 %; Fig. 2). On panel P, 9 of the 10 such variants are rejected and only the variant without Sweden_Rossberga_N fits (p = 0.105; Fig. 3); the model counts as rejected on panel P.
For the Middle Bronze Age persons, England Beaker alone is rejected on both panels (p = 2.3×10⁻¹⁰ and ≈ 3×10⁻¹⁵; Table 4). England Beaker with England Neolithic (90–91 % and 9–10 %) and England Beaker with France Early Bronze Age (74–77 % and 23–26 %) are retained on both panels (p from 0.079 to 0.334). The runs do not separate the two.
Table 3 | qpAdm models of the Beaker-period persons (n=20), panels D and P
Model
Sources
Panel
Weights (SE)
p
χ² (df)
Verdict
BB1
Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic
D
93.8 % + 6.2 % (1.3 pp)
0.687
9.2 (12)
retained
BB1
Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic
P
93.1 % + 6.9 % (1.3 pp)
0.0018
26.4 (9)
rejected
BB2
Czechia Beaker + England Neolithic
D
infeasible
0.021
–
rejected
BB2
Czechia Beaker + England Neolithic
P
infeasible
0.0003
–
rejected
BB3
Netherlands Beaker alone
D
100 %
0.0046
–
rejected
BB3
Netherlands Beaker alone
P
100 %
4.5×10⁻⁸
–
rejected
BB4
England Neolithic alone
D
100 %
≈ 0
4305.2 (13)
rejected
BB4
England Neolithic alone
P
100 %
≈ 0
4582.9 (10)
rejected
Retained: p ≥ 0.05, all weights between 0 and 100 %, weight SE below 10 percentage points (pp). SE: block-jackknife standard error of the weight; the two weights of a model sum to 100 % and share one SE. –: not listed. Netherlands Beaker is Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker, England Neolithic is England_N (46 samples).
Table 4 | qpAdm models of the Middle Bronze Age persons (n=25), panels D and P
Model
Sources
Panel
Weights (SE)
p
χ² (df)
Verdict
MB1
England Beaker alone
D
100 %
2.3×10⁻¹⁰
72.9 (13)
rejected
MB1
England Beaker alone
P
100 %
≈ 3×10⁻¹⁵
91.3 (10)
rejected
MB2
England Beaker + England Neolithic
D
91.3 % + 8.7 % (1.2 pp)
0.104
18.4 (12)
retained
MB2
England Beaker + England Neolithic
P
90.2 % + 9.8 % (1.1 pp)
0.079
15.5 (9)
retained
MB3
England Beaker + France Early Bronze Age
D
77.3 % + 22.7 % (2.8 pp)
0.202
15.8 (12)
retained
MB3
England Beaker + France Early Bronze Age
P
74.3 % + 25.7 % (2.6 pp)
0.334
10.2 (9)
retained
All three models declared for this target are shown. England Beaker is the group of the 20 Beaker-period persons of the maps. Retained, SE and pp as in Table 3.
Figure 2 | Right-panel sensitivity of BB1 from panel D. Netherlands Beaker + England Neolithic for the Beaker-period persons, base panel D. The base model fits (p = 0.687). All 13 variants that drop one right group fit (p from 0.48 to 0.87; Netherlands Beaker 93.6–94.3 %). The alternative panel P rejects the model (p = 0.0018); each source alone is rejected.
Figure 3 | Right-panel sensitivity of BB1 from panel P. The same model, base panel P: rejected (p = 0.0018; 93.1 % and 6.9 %). Of the 10 variants that drop one right group, 9 are rejected (p from 0.0007 to 0.009) and one fits: without Sweden_Rossberga_N, p = 0.105. The alternative panel D fits (p = 0.687). The variant that fits is a sensitivity result and does not change the verdict on panel P.
Reading the three methods
Beaker period. The three methods point the same way. The map places the closest contemporaneous genomes on the continent; in rescaled PCA distances the persons lie closer to the Netherlands Beaker group than to the English Neolithic in all six settings; in qpAdm Netherlands Beaker with 6 % English Neolithic fits on panel D, and England Neolithic alone is rejected on both panels. qpAdm fits on one of the two right-panel sets only.
Middle Bronze Age. The English Beaker group alone does not fit. In both retained models it carries 74–91 % of the persons, and the rest is English Neolithic (9–10 %) or French Early Bronze Age (23–26 %); these runs do not tell the two apart. The map of the Middle Bronze Age persons is flatter than that of the Beaker-period persons, with Britain and Ireland second (11 %).
What the methods show and what they do not. A map position and a PCA distance describe where similar genomes lie, not ancestry, and peaks follow where DNA has been sampled. Only qpAdm gives weights, and these hold for the stated sources and right panels. A source in a model is a sampled group; its name does not say where the ancestors lived.
Data and methods. Match maps: own Gaussian-process implementation following the principle of Mobest (Schmid & Schiffels 2023); not the Mobest software, not PANE, not qpAdm; exploratory, post hoc. Training data: 12,990 ancient individuals of the AADR v66 (29.9–70 °N, −24–70 °E, 150–8500 BP, at least 15,000 SNPs, one version per person, training window ±2000 years); response: four Nexju N25 PCA coordinates (European PC1–2, Middle-Eastern PC1–2); kernel 800 km and 800 years; nugget 0.4 and the variance of each coordinate fitted by marginal likelihood on a random subset of 5,008 of the 9,271 reference individuals dated 1,080–6,328 BP; 5,124–8,226 training individuals per person; map: product of normal densities, normalised to 1, 40 km grid without land mask, smoothed to 10 km by cubic interpolation; the 45 persons shown are left out of the reference. Validation: on Albania, a Balkan peak appeared for 2 of 4 test persons. The maps were computed with the author's own code; they are not a Nexju analysis run. Rescaled PCA distances: Nexju PCA-distance run on maps A and B with the base panel WE8-shrinkmode (992,097 SNPs) and the settings WE8-plain and EU5-shrinkmode (970,217 SNPs); 16 origin shifts; bootstrap of 2,000 resamples, 95 %; a statement is stable when it holds in at least 5 of 6 settings, at least 13 of 16 shifts and in the bootstrap. qpAdm: Nexju qpAdm, alpha 0.05, allSnps = false. Panel D (14 right groups): Australian, Papuan, Mbuti, Karitiana, Turkey_PPN, Israel_Natufian, Iran_WezmehCave_N, Italy_Sicily_Epigravettian, Turkey_N, Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya, Iran_GanjDareh_N, Georgia_KotiasKlde_Mesolithic, Serbia_IronGates_Mesolithic, Russia_Karelia_Mesolithic. Panel P (11 right groups): Australian, Papuan, Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya, Iran_GanjDareh_N, Georgia_KotiasKlde_Mesolithic, Sweden_Mesolithic_HG, Germany_GrossFredenwalde_Mesolithic, France_Yonne_N, Austria_N_LBK, Germany_BlatterhohleCave_MN, Sweden_Rossberga_N. Sources: Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker, Czechia_BellBeaker, England_N, France_EBA and the 20 Beaker-period persons (GP_England_BellBeaker). Targets: GP_England_BellBeaker (20) and GP_England_MBA (25). Models and right-group panels were fixed before the runs.
1.
Schmid, C. & Schiffels, S. Estimating human mobility in Holocene Western Eurasia with large-scale ancient genomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120(9), e2218375120 (2023).
2.
Taleb, N. N., Zalloua, P., Elbassioni, K., Hatzikirou, H., Henschel, A. & Platt, D. E. Informational rescaling of PCA maps with application to genetic distance. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 27, 48–56 (2025).
3.
Olalde, I. et al. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555, 190–196 (2018).
Where do contemporaneous genomes that resemble people of England come from? An exploratory spatio-temporal match map for 14 English groups in seven periods, from the Neolithic to the present day, read by country.
The same PCA axes and individuals read on the plain map and on the entropy-rescaled maps of Taleb et al.: which statements about the nearest group, the side and the position between two groups change, and which do not.
Where modern English groups sit among ancient British, continental Germanic and neighbouring modern groups on a conventional and two entropy-rescaled PCA maps, and which distance statements hold across three reference panels.
PCA
MAMvagnus Albertus ·
Allow analytics cookies? They help us see how the site is used so we can improve it. Your DNA and results are never included. Details